Do you see our students' trades?

No, and neither do we. Each student's tradebook is read inside their own browser and the file is never uploaded. What reaches the cohort view is a short list of derived figures: their score, the share of trades matching each behavioural pattern, and coarse buckets for scale. No instrument, no price, no quantity, no timestamp and no filename ever leaves the student's device.

Is a student's submission anonymous?

It is pseudonymous, which is a different and weaker claim. Each submission carries an opaque participant identifier rather than a name or an email, so the cohort view cannot name anyone. But a small cohort can still be identifying by inference: in a group of four, a single outlier is recognisable. Riskora does not yet enforce a minimum cohort size, so for now this is a limitation to plan around rather than a protection we provide.

Does a student have to take part?

No. Nothing is submitted unless the student is asked and agrees, on their own report, after they have read it. Declining leaves their report exactly as it was. The prompt only appears at all when they open Mirror through a link your academy hands out.

Can the score be used to grade or rank students?

We ask that it is not, and the product is built to make it awkward. The score measures consistency against a trader's own history, not skill, not profitability and not potential. It cannot establish whether a student followed rules they never wrote down. Using it to grade, rank or select students for funding would be reading it for something it does not measure.

How many academies use this today?

None. The cohort layer is built and tested end to end, and no academy is using it yet. There are no case studies, no retention figures and no claimed learning outcomes, because none exist. The first academies to use it will be doing so to find out whether it is useful.

Riskora for academies · behavioural review for a cohort

You teach the setup. Their own tradebook shows what they do with it.

Every student reads their own trading history in their own browser and gets a report on their behaviour: how fast they re-enter after a loss, how their position size moves, how long they sit in a losing trade. If they choose to contribute, you see what the cohort has in common. You never see their trades.

Talk about a pilot See what a student sees

Where this actually stands, before you read further

The cohort layer is built and tested end to end. It is also not in use by any academy. There are no case studies, no retention figures and no measured learning outcomes on this page, because none exist. The first academies to use it will be finding out whether it is worth their students' time, and that is the honest offer: a pilot designed to answer that question, not a product with a track record.

Two things are also not yet built, and they matter for a cohort: Riskora does not enforce a minimum cohort size, so a small group's aggregates can be identifying by inference, and the multi-tenant isolation tests have not been run in a staging environment. Both are named in our compliance notes. We would rather you know that now than discover it at week three.

How it works for a cohort

You hand out a link

A plain Mirror link with your pilot's identifier on it. Students need no account and install nothing. A student who opens Mirror any other way is never asked to contribute anything.

The student reads their own file

They export their tradebook from their broker and choose it. The analysis runs in their browser: the parsing, the matching of buys to sells, the scoring, all of it. The file is never uploaded. They can open their own developer tools and watch that no request carries it, which is the only form of this promise worth making.

They decide whether to contribute

After they have read their report, they are asked once. Declining changes nothing about what they see. Agreeing sends a short list of derived figures and nothing else.

You see the cohort, not the students

A signed-in educator view showing how many participated, the spread of scores across bands, and the share of the cohort each behavioural pattern was found in. Each share states the number of tradebooks it could be measured from, because a pattern that needs trade times cannot be measured on an export that has none, and a percentage over eight students should not read as a statement about twenty.

What leaves a student's device, exactly

This is the whole list. It is a whitelist in the source, copied field by field, which is deliberate: a list of things to exclude would quietly admit the next field somebody added.

Sent	Never sent
Their Discipline Score, and whether there were enough trades for it to be stable	Any instrument, symbol or contract
The share of their trades matching each behavioural pattern, as a proportion	Any price, quantity or position size
Coarse buckets for scale, such as "51 to 200 trades", never the exact count	Any timestamp, or the order of their trades
An opaque participant identifier, so a second run from the same browser is recognisable as the same person	Their profit or loss, in any form
The engine and consent version the figures were produced under	Their name, email, broker or filename

A file with dates but no trade times contributes nothing at all rather than contributing a row of blanks, because a row of blanks would drag every cohort percentage toward a pattern that was never measured for that student.

What this does not do

Not a grading instrument

It does not measure skill, profitability or potential.
It cannot tell whether a student followed rules they never wrote down.
It should not rank students, or select them for funding.

Not a trading system

No order ever reaches an exchange. Trading inside Riskora's own terminal uses virtual capital.
No live broker connection, and no advice, tips or calls on any instrument.
No claim that a score predicts what a student will do next.

What a pilot would involve

A pilot exists to answer one question: does structured behavioural review change anything for your students? That question needs a cohort, a period long enough for a second run to mean something, and your honest read at the end.

What we would agree	In writing, before anything starts
Who the cohort is	Adults, and students who are told what this is before they are given the link
What is collected	The list above, unchanged, with the consent version recorded against each submission
How long it is kept	A stated retention period, and a route for a student to have their submissions deleted
Who can read it	Named educators on your side. Access is derived from who is signed in, not from the link they open
What it is not used for	Grading, ranking, or selecting students for capital
What we publish	Nothing about your academy or your students without your written agreement

Questions an educator should ask

Do you see our students' trades?: No, and neither do we. The tradebook is read in the student's browser and never uploaded. What reaches the cohort view is the list above.
Is a submission anonymous?: It is pseudonymous, which is a weaker claim and worth the distinction. Submissions carry an opaque identifier rather than a name, so the cohort view cannot name anyone. But a small cohort can be identifying by inference: in a group of four, one outlier is recognisable. Riskora does not yet enforce a minimum cohort size, so today that is a limitation to plan around and not a protection we provide.
Does a student have to take part?: No. They are asked once, on their own report, after they have read it. Declining leaves their report exactly as it was.
Can we use the score to grade or rank?: We ask that you do not. It measures consistency against a trader's own history, not skill and not profitability. Reading it as a ranking is reading it for something it does not measure.
How many academies use this today?: None. It is built and tested, and unsold. That is the current position and this page will say so until it changes.
What does it cost?: There is no published price for a cohort, because there is no delivery model proven enough to price. A first pilot would be scoped and agreed directly. If you would rather see the individual product's pricing, it is on the home page.
We are a broker, not an academy.: The considerations are different enough to be written separately. See Riskora for brokers.

Talk to us

If you run a cohort and this is worth a conversation, write to support@riskora.in. Useful things to include: roughly how many students, which brokers they use, and what you currently do about behaviour. If this is not a fit, we will say so rather than scope a pilot around it.

Before that, the most useful thing you can do is run your own tradebook through Mirror. It is free, needs no account, and it is exactly what your students would see.